Monetary policy blunder in Japan

 


The Bank of Japan (BOJ), the Japanese central bank, today (19 March 2024) announced a landmark change in its monetary policy by raising the policy interest rates first time in 17 years along with several tool amendments to its monetary policy. 

Therefore, the purpose of this article is to express my views that the BOJ decision today is another point in its monetary policy blunder that has existed miserably in the past 30 years to get the economy out from deflation trap.

BOJ monetary policy focus - Inflation control

In line with the old tradition of central banks, the BOJ also follows monetary policy to drive inflation towards a target in the medium to long term. For the past two decades, its inflation target has been 2% parallel to other developed countries.

However, Japan has been confronting a deflation trap during the past 2-3 decades. Therefore, unlike in other countries, the BOJ has been pursuing the monetary policy to boost inflation.

Inflation in Japan



For this purpose, the BOJ has been printing money to flood the economy with liquidity at negative or close to zero interest rates. As there is no ideal monetary policy formula for it, the BOJ has been adopting several monetary models from time to time.

BOJ monetary policy models

The BOJ implemented three main models of monetary policy for easy money printing during last three decades.
  • Policy interest rate for excess reserves of banks
This is the usual price target set by central banks for inter-bank overnight call money which drives money printing. The rate was reduced to 0.10% in 2009 and to negative 0.10% in 2016.

Policy Rates and Inflation in Japan


  • Monetary base control
This was the model followed for Quantitative Easing (QE) during the post-global financial crisis at interest rate close to zero similar to other developed countries.

Monetary base is the concept used by many central banks to estimate the amount of printed by them. Accordingly, the sum of currency in circulation and reserve balances of banks held at the central bank is the monetary base.

Accordingly, BOJ printed money through the purchase of securities, mainly government securities, to meet monetary base target. The BOJ announced monetary base target used for money printing at its policy meetings.

  • Quantitative and Qualitative Easing (QQE) and yield curve control

This is the new version of QE followed liberally since April 2013. Accordingly, BOJ pursued a large scale of purchases of securities, i.e., government securities, Exchange Traded Funds (ETSs), Japan real estate investment funds (J-REIFs), commercial papers and corporate bonds at proportions as announced from time to time. The monetary base control was used to measure the scale of money printing.

In September 2016, the yield curve control tool was added to QQE. Accordingly, the BOJ purchased government securities to keep10-year government yield around zero. In 2023, 10-year yield target was raised to 0.25% and then to 0.50% as a measure of signaling of a market interest rate hike. Therefore, monetary base control became an irrelevant policy tool.

Meanwhile, policy rate was kept at negative 0.10% to penalize banks for parking excess liquidity at the BOJ and to guide short-term market interest rates.

New monetary policy model announced today

The BOJ ended the QQE with yield curve control and negative interest rates model and announced the new model with following guideline for market operations.

  • Uncollateralized overnight call money rate target of 0-0.10%. This is to guide short-term interest rates as primary policy tool.

  • BOJ paying interest at 0.10% on excess reserve balances of banks held at BOJ current accounts. This is to achieve the above guideline.

  • BOJ continuing with government securities purchase broadly same amount as before, i.e., monthly around 6 trillion yen, as required to stabilize long-term interest rates.

  • Other asset purchases

    • Discontinue purchase of ETFs and J-REITs

    • Reduce gradually purchase of Commercial Papers and corporate bonds and discontinue purchases in about one year.

  • BOJ new loan disbursement at 0.10% interest rate for duration of one year to stimulate bank lending

    • loans under Funds-Provisioning Measure to stimulate bank lending

    • loans under Funds-Supplying Operation to support financial institutions in disaster areas

    • loans under Funds-Supplying Operation to support financing for climate change responses

Although this model seems to be a sort of monetary tightening due to inflation rising beyond 2% after 2-3 decades, the policy statement says that the BOJ anticipates accommodative financial conditions be maintained for the time being, given the current outlook for economic activity and prices.

Overall policy outcome

  • BOJ has failed to boost inflation towards 2% from zero or negative territory during the past 2-3 decades, despite liberal money printing through various policy models highlighted above.

  • Inflation seems to have risen comfortably above 2% target in 2023 due to global supply chain disruptions and cost escalation. However, inflation now has commenced falling again and seems not achieved the target sustainably. With global inflationary pressures now falling notably, the risk of Japanese disinflation again below 2% target seems to be very high.

  • Therefore, the new monetary policy model announced today is nothing but another money printing model introduced by the new BOJ Governor similar to those in the past. He, at a recent press meting participated by Central Bank Governor of US, UK and Europe, cracked a joke that the transmission of the QE followed by the BOJ during the past 25 years will continue for at least another 25 years in the future.

  • The BOJ has been keeping monetary policy extra loose during the past 2-3 decades although other central banks had several policy cycles of tightening and loosening. Therefore, BOJ does not belong to the global club of monetary policy.

  • Inflation control-based monetary policy is disproved by Japanese economy beyond doubt as it has failed to boost inflation, despite so much money printing and government debt reaching the largest 252% of GDP with a significant portion funded by the BOJ, where no IMF or economists raise concerns over inflationary pressures or unsustainability behind such a huge debt pile.

  • What BOJ has been doing in its monetary policy of varied versions introduced from time to time has been to print money liberally to provide liquidity/reserves to the economy, i.e., government, banks and financial institutions, corporates and investors. This is because what is necessary from a modern central bank is the extension of the day-to-day support to manage liquidity needs of the economy by different sectors. All monetary tools and models are not part of any science but arbitary ways of money printing. Therefore, inflation control story preached by central banks and their followers is only a tribal cloth of central banks to hide behind money printing.
In view of above highlights in this article, the new BOJ monetary policy provides valuable lessons to central banks in countries to fight poverty development if they take BOJ monetary policy story positively.

(This article is released in the interest of participating in the professional dialogue to find out solutions to present economic crisis confronted by the general public consequent to the global Corona pandemic, subsequent economic disruptions and shocks both local and global and policy failures. All are personal views of the author based on his research in the subject of Economics which have not intension to personally or maliciously discredit characters of any individuals.)

P Samarasiri

Former Deputy Governor, Central Bank of Sri Lanka

(Former Director of Bank Supervision, Assistant Governor, Secretary to the Monetary Board and Compliance Officer of the Central Bank, Former Chairman of the Sri Lanka Accounting and Auditing Standards Board and Credit Information Bureau, Former Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Institute of Bankers of Sri Lanka, Former Member of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Insurance Regulatory Commission and the Author of 12 Economics and Banking Books and a large number of articles published. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politics of Monetary Policy - 1% rate cut on the table?

Image
  Article's Background This article predicts that the Monetary Policy Board at the next meeting due on 24 July at 7.00 a.m.  will cut the policy interest rates at least by 100 basis points in view of the present macroeconomic outlook and political stability pending the Presidential Election in October. Policy rate decision by central banks cross the globe is a highly arbitrary bureaucratic exercise. It is based on qualitative judgement on the outlook of the consumer inflation and possible deviations from the inflation targets of central banks. However, central banks can provide diverse macroeconomic stories to support what ever the policy decision as they wish as nothing is experimental or empirical or past perormance is legally assessed. The Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell stated at the latest testimony before the Senate Banking Committee held on 09 July 2024 that the Fed would not need to wait for inflation to reach exactly at the target (2%) to commence the rate cutt...
Read more

Central bank monetary system failed: Diagnosis and prescription. Treatment is urgent and difficult.

Image
  Article's background  The purpose of this article is is to reveal how the failure of the monetary concept that has been pursued for the past 73 years has caused the bankruptcy of Sri Lankan economy in 2022. Economic or business bankruptcy is essentially a monetary phenomenon. The background of this view is as follows. Central banks world-wide rest on the concept of old quantity theory to carry out their money printing operations despite the long rhetoric of underlying stories. This theory simply predicts that if the growth of money supply or stock runs faster than the growth of output (or real GDP), the economy will confront an inflation equal to the difference between money supply growth and output growth. For example, if money supply grows annually by 15% while output grows by 7%, inflation will be 8%. This is the famous monetary belief that inflation is always a result of too much quantity of money chasing after too little quantity of goods. This states that inflation is ...
Read more

CB misappropriates Rs. 235 bn of profit - A daylight scandal on public property?

Image
  The Central Bank (CB) has released its Annual Report over the bankrupt economy in 2022. Unlike in the recent past, there was no photo shoot of presenting it to the Minister released to the media with a note of highlights. As such, the Monetary Board seems to have covered up its shame of driving the economy into bankruptcy while sleeping on the Monetary Law Act (MLA) by releasing the annual report covertly. As usual, this annual report is also just a report over the economy in 2020. Therefore, it is not a report of the Monetary Board as required in the MLA on the condition of the CB and a review of the policies and measures adopted by the Monetary Board in the economic context in 2022. This article only highlights how the Monetary Board has hidden the profit on money printing by not transferring the profit to the government as required in the MLA. MLA Requirement on Profit Distribution The Part IV of the MLA sets out the procedure for calculation and distribution of the CB's profi...
Read more